forensic accounting expertise
Content: Zadanie_2_1 (1).docx (20.91 KB)
Uploaded: 07.07.2023
Positive responses: 0
Negative responses: 0
Sold: 0
Refunds: 0
$1.86
By decision of the investigator, a forensic accounting examination was appointed based on the materials of criminal case No. 000002, initiated on the grounds of a crime under Art. 160 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, upon receipt of inflated wages by the chief accountant of Norma LLC Ivanova V.G.
The investigation found that between January 2004 and to March 2004 inclusive, chief accountant of Norma LLC Ivanova V.G. when calculating her wages, increased its size, as a result of which she received, for the specified period, the amount of 253,973.00 rubles, which is significantly higher than she was entitled to according to the staffing table.
The investigator posed the following questions for the expert´s permission:
1. What is the amount of actually accrued wages to the chief accountant of Norma LLC Ivanova V.G. for the period from January 1, 2004. to March 31, 2004?
2. What is the amount of wages actually received by the chief accountant of Norma LLC Ivanova V.G. from the cash desk of Norma LLC for the period from January 1, 2004. to March 31, 2004?
3. What is the difference between the amount of wages payable when used in the salary calculation according to the staffing table (memos of the director of the enterprise) to the chief accountant of Norma LLC Ivanova V.G., and the amount actually received by Ivanova V.G. wages from the cash desk of Norma LLC for the period from January 1, 2004. to March 31, 2004?
For the production of forensic accounting expertise, materials of criminal No. 000003 are presented:
• materials of a documentary audit for 6 sheets;
• general ledgers of OOO Norma for 2004-2005. for 135 liters;
• primary cash documents for 2004-2005. for 256 liters;
• Record of interrogation of witness Yu.B. Petrov. for 4 l.;
• individual cards for accounting for accrued payments and other remunerations by Ivanova V.G. for 2004, for 2005, for 3 sheets.
Assignment questions:
1. Do the questions put to the experts´ permission meet the basic requirements for the wording of questions?
2. Are the materials submitted for the examination sufficient for giving an opinion?
3. What will be the type of conclusions on the questions posed (categorical, probabilistic, not possible), provided that no more materials are submitted for research?
The investigation found that between January 2004 and to March 2004 inclusive, chief accountant of Norma LLC Ivanova V.G. when calculating her wages, increased its size, as a result of which she received, for the specified period, the amount of 253,973.00 rubles, which is significantly higher than she was entitled to according to the staffing table.
The investigator posed the following questions for the expert´s permission:
1. What is the amount of actually accrued wages to the chief accountant of Norma LLC Ivanova V.G. for the period from January 1, 2004. to March 31, 2004?
2. What is the amount of wages actually received by the chief accountant of Norma LLC Ivanova V.G. from the cash desk of Norma LLC for the period from January 1, 2004. to March 31, 2004?
3. What is the difference between the amount of wages payable when used in the salary calculation according to the staffing table (memos of the director of the enterprise) to the chief accountant of Norma LLC Ivanova V.G., and the amount actually received by Ivanova V.G. wages from the cash desk of Norma LLC for the period from January 1, 2004. to March 31, 2004?
For the production of forensic accounting expertise, materials of criminal No. 000003 are presented:
• materials of a documentary audit for 6 sheets;
• general ledgers of OOO Norma for 2004-2005. for 135 liters;
• primary cash documents for 2004-2005. for 256 liters;
• Record of interrogation of witness Yu.B. Petrov. for 4 l.;
• individual cards for accounting for accrued payments and other remunerations by Ivanova V.G. for 2004, for 2005, for 3 sheets.
Assignment questions:
1. Do the questions put to the experts´ permission meet the basic requirements for the wording of questions?
2. Are the materials submitted for the examination sufficient for giving an opinion?
3. What will be the type of conclusions on the questions posed (categorical, probabilistic, not possible), provided that no more materials are submitted for research?
Dear buyer, the proposed product is recommended to be used as an aid to increase knowledge. All products offered in the store have already been evaluated by teachers and accepted. It must be remembered that legislation may change and some sources (for example, editions of legal acts) may become outdated - they must be edited, as well as the content of the work itself. These works can be an excellent example, but it is not recommended to use the content of the product without making personal adjustments and changes. For example, you can easily add some of your own findings or expand on some of the information already presented. We really hope that this product will be of use to you. We wish you good luck in your studies!!!
No feedback yet