Content: S19-765.docx (16.93 KB)
Uploaded: 30.03.2020

Positive responses: 0
Negative responses: 0

Sold: 1
Refunds: 0

$0.19
The workers of the engineering plant were fired on the following grounds:
1) under paragraph 5 of article 81 shopping mall - the barmaid of the dining room Tkachev. Despite repeated reminders, she did not undergo a medical examination, for which, by order of the head of the canteen, she was suspended from work and reprimanded;
2) under sub. “A” p. 6 art. 81 shopping mall - driver Lysenko. For violation of traffic rules he was deprived of a driver´s license for one year. The head of the transport department transferred him to a car mechanic. The driver refused the transfer and did not go to work;
3) under sub. "D" p. 6 of article 81 TK - senior foreman of the construction site of the Tesnoy factory. He systematically violated the rules of the internal work schedule: he refused to pass exams on building codes, labor protection and safety, and on the rules for operating cranes;
4) under sub. “C” paragraph 6 of Art. 81 TK - personnel inspectors Saltykov. She refused to provide the commercial firm with information on the home telephone numbers of the factory workers.
How legal and justified is each dismissal?
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet