Ivanov, resigned from the municipal service

Ivanov, who quit the municipal service in connection with the liquidation of the local government, appealed to the state institution of the employment service to recognize him unemployed. He worked as a leading specialist in the public relations department. This position belongs to the leading group of municipal service posts.
In the institution of employment, he was offered a job as an inspector of the human resources department at SK Stroy LLC. Ivanov refused this work, because the work offered to him is not a municipal service and, accordingly, he will not be provided with social guarantees provided for municipal employees (extended annual paid leave, etc.), he was also not comfortable with the fact that a six-day working week was established in the construction organization.
Further, he was offered a job as a 1st-level specialist in the territorial tax authority (junior group of positions), which Ivanov also refused, referring to the low monetary content that they receive from the federal executive authorities, as well as the fact that he should be provided the position of the state civil service is not lower than that (in the group) that he held before his dismissal.
After the second refusal, they explained to him that they could not recognize him unemployed, because there was a rejection of two options for suitable work. Ivanov, considering the refusal unreasonable, applied for clarification to the prosecution authorities.
Who is right? What guarantees are provided to municipal employees upon his dismissal in connection with the liquidation of local governments.