Content: S19-673.docx (16.83 KB)
Uploaded: 29.03.2020

Positive responses: 0
Negative responses: 0

Sold: 3
Refunds: 0

$0.19
Sevastyanov from 1985 to 1993 He was married to Fitina, from whom he has a seven-year-old son. After the divorce, the child remained to live with his mother, who in 1997 entered into a second marriage and changed the name of her son without the consent of Sevastyanov. In 1998, the mother of the child died, Sevastyanov wanted to take his son, but his stepfather began to hinder this.
The stepfather motivates his refusal to transfer the child to the fact that the child has actually lived with him since 1989, the conditions for his upbringing are good, the child is attached to him and, in the presence of representatives of guardianship and trusteeship agencies, confirmed his desire to live with him, and the transfer to his father may adversely affect the child.
How can Sevastyanov solve the issue of transferring his son to him?
For an example of this incident, consider the issues of personal rights of parents.
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet