At a meeting of CJSC Tuman, which was attended by representatives of shareholders holding a total of 85% of the voting shares, it was decided to increase the authorized capital of the company by one third by issuing additional shares. At the same time, it was decided to distribute all the shares of the new issue among the shareholders participating in the meeting. Other shareholders of the company did not agree with this decision, believing that as a result of the additional issue, their share in the authorized capital would be significantly reduced. In addition, some shareholders who did not participate in the meeting claimed that they were not notified of the meeting. The director of the company told dissatisfied shareholders that they themselves were to blame for their non-participation in the meeting, their votes could not affect the decision made, and they should ask about the time and place of the meeting on their own.
Solve the case. Will the decision be changed if it turns out that all the shareholders of the company were duly notified of the general meeting? Will the decision change when it comes to OAO?
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet