In February 1998, the qualification collegium of judges of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Okrug dismissed the applicant to the European Court of Human Rights, a citizen of the Russian Federation P., a judge of the district court of Noyabrsky and a member of the Zhiva Vera church from the position of a judge due to abuse of his official position regulations on the implementation of religious activities in the interests of the church.
P. filed a complaint with the Higher Qualification Collegium of Judges of the Russian Federation. In May 1998, the Board rejected P.´s complaint, after which she filed a complaint with the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation - the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation recognized that the applicant was engaged in propaganda of the church and religious intimidation of the parties in the process by which she was appointed a judge.
Have the applicant exhausted all domestic remedies, as required by paragraph 1 of Art. 35 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms? Was there a case, according to the applicant, of a violation of Art. 9, 10 and 14 of the Convention?
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet