By the decision of the district court, a division of the jointly acquired property of the Barinov spouses was made. Six months later, Barinova filed a lawsuit in the court to review this decision due to newly discovered circumstances, indicating that after the decision came into force, she became aware that her former spouse had acquired an apartment building during her life together and had hidden this fact from her. In this regard, the house was not included in the list of joint property of the spouses. Barinova believes that the previous court decision should be quashed and the case reviewed in view of the newly discovered circumstance.
Is the circumstance referred to by Barinov newly discovered?
What is the procedure for reviewing decisions?
Document the court response.
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet