Content: S19-167.docx (17.08 KB)
Uploaded: 14.10.2019

Positive responses: 0
Negative responses: 0

Sold: 0
Refunds: 0

$0.17
The local government appealed to the court with a claim against Isaev to declare Pysin the contract of sale of the apartment invalid due to the deterioration of the living conditions of his minor son. Due to Isaev’s failure to appear at the court hearing on June 11, the court issued an absentee decision to satisfy the claims, and the preparation of a reasoned decision was postponed for three days, but this was done 10 days later. Unable to get acquainted with the full content of the court’s decision, Isaev filed a “preliminary” cassation appeal on June 16, in which he indicated that he had not been notified of the time and place of the court in a timely manner, did not agree with the court’s decision, but didn’t give concrete arguments in support of the illegality . The judge refused to accept the cassation appeal in connection with the fact that it does not meet the requirements.
Give a legal assessment of the situation.
Should such a cassation appeal be accepted?
What should a judge do when a cassation complaint does not meet the requirements?
Are there grounds for canceling a court decision?
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet