In the case of debt collection in the amount of 130 thousand rubles. the plaintiff asked the court to accept as evidence a video recording of his wife’s birthday, during which the defendant asks for money from him, promising to return it within a week.
The defendant objects to the study of the video by the court, believing that the loan agreement can only be confirmed by written evidence, which the plaintiff does not have.
Which side is right?
Can in this case the video confirm the facts included in the subject of proof?
What is the court’s investigation of video recordings?
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet