A magistrate of the city of Vladikavkaz received a statement of claim from LLC Pchelka to recover from Aidarov, an Ossetian by nationality, 10,000 rubles. shortages. At the beginning of the trial, which was conducted in Russian, the defendant filed a motion to provide him with an interpreter from the Ossetian language, since he speaks Russian very poorly.
The court rejected Aidarov’s petition and stated that the defendant is fluent in the Russian language, and this petition was aimed solely at delaying the process. The defendant could have declared the need for an interpreter while preparing the case for trial, but he did not state such a motion.
During the trial, the representative of the defendant recorded the statements of the participants in the process on a voice recorder. The judge banned the production of audio recordings, as this interferes with the conduct of the process.
What principles of civil procedure are violated in this case?
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet