On November 9, 2006, Barovskiy appealed to the arbitration court with a claim for invalidation of the minutes of the general meeting of participants of Agricultural Machinery LLC dated November 28, 2005, according to which Volkov was elected director of the company. In support of its claims, the plaintiff referred to the violation of the procedure for holding the meeting, since the notice of its holding was signed not by the former director of the company, Sviridov, but by one of its participants, Silin.
A representative of Selkhozavtomatika LLC pointed to the insignificance of the share of Barovskiy in the authorized capital (1%). Silin, attracted as a third party, said that he had indeed signed the notice, since he owns 51% in the authorized capital of an LLC, and he called himself erroneous as a director.
Analyze the situation. What circumstances determine the decision of the case?
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet