Turner Firsov filed a lawsuit against the company for the recovery of the cost of a jacket stolen from a wardrobe. In his opinion, the administration did not take the necessary measures to ensure the safety of the property of its employees: the cloakroom attendant left the place of work without locking the door.
At the court hearing, the representative of the company explained that the proceedings should be discontinued, since the employee did not comply with the pre-trial procedure for resolving the dispute provided for by the Labor Code of the Russian Federation: he did not address the employer with the corresponding statement.
What should the court do?
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet