The citizen went to a medical clinic with complaints of back pain. After the survey, he was offered a course of massage and water treatments. After several sessions, the pain passed, however, after the end of the entire course of the procedures, the pain resumed. The citizen demanded that the clinic return the cost of the procedures and the payment of compensation for non-pecuniary damage, since not only did the promised recovery not occur, but the state of health did not even improve. The representative of the clinic argued that massage and water procedures could not harm the health of the citizen, and his back pain was caused by a disease that existed previously, but manifested itself against the background of the procedures; if the citizen continues the treatment, then there is a high probability that the causes of the pain will be completely eliminated.
What decision should be made by the court if the citizen appeals to the clinic for the return of the cost of the procedures that did not bring the promised positive result, and for compensation to him, as a consumer, of moral harm?
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet