Content: S18-268.docx (13.78 KB)
Uploaded: 19.11.2018

Positive responses: 0
Negative responses: 0

Sold: 1
Refunds: 0

$0.14
Nikolaev, the owner of a small building, was absent for a long time, kicking up windows and doors. The district administration ordered to open the house. After drawing up an act of destruction of the house, 75 percent of the land on which the house was located was set aside for building Konstantinov. The house of Nikolaev was handed over to Konstantinov free of charge as building materials.
During the summer construction season, Konstantinov completely restored the house, rescheduled and overhauled it.
In the autumn Nikolaev returned to his former place of residence, who demanded that Konstantinov be handed over to him at home. Konstantinov suggested that Nikolayev turn to the district administration, which recognized Nikolayev’s unfounded claim, citing his long absence.
In what order and how should the case be resolved?
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet