16-year-old Boris Pirozhkov hijacked Zaitsev’s car, left unattended by him with the doors open and the key in the ignition lock at the store. Driving at a high speed intersection, he crashed into a car in Turin. Due to a collision and a change in the direction of movement of the car of Turin, a citizen of Sokolov was shot down, who ran across the street to a red light, hurrying along on business. In addition, citizen Petrova, who was in the car in Turin as a passenger, was seriously injured.
Traffic police officers who arrived on the scene, it was found that he was guilty of accidents Pies; the fault of Turin in the collision of cars is missing.
After long treatment, Sokolov was recognized as an invalid of the first group; the loss of his professional working capacity was 80%. The average monthly salary of Sokolov was 8,000 rubles. Petrova also for a long time lost her special work ability by 50%. Her business income averaged 15,000 rubles per month. Turin, due to damage to his car, suffered losses in the amount of 20,000 rubles, and Zaitsev - 30,000.
Boris Pirozhkov works at the plant, but his salary is not enough to fulfill the arising obligations for the reimbursement of time. A year ago, Pirozhkov´s parents were deprived of their parental rights and, therefore, refused to compensate for the damage caused to the victims.
Who, in what order and size should compensate for the damage caused to Sokolov, Petrova, Turin and Zaitsev? What circumstances should be taken into account when solving this issue?
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet